ACWXvsDBAWETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
+0.68%
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. ACWX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.4% for DBAW. ACWX is up 11.84% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9.22B in YTD flows. DBAW performs better with 13.79% YTD performance, and +$88M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWX and DBAW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWX vs DBAW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWX DBAW | -2.59%-2.57% | -0.25%-1.55% | +11.84%+13.79% | +13.78%+16.21% | +79.16%+79.54% | +49.83%+73.68% |
| Flows | ACWX DBAW | +$2.08B+$19M | +$6.74B+$57M | +$9.22B+$88M | +$10.00B+$100M | +$10.91B+$119M | +$11.36B+$130M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWX DBAW | +13.59%+9.87% | +16.87%+12.29% | +14.83%+11.24% | +15.81%+11.40% |
| Max drawdown | ACWX DBAW | -6.30%-4.74% | -11.33%-8.71% | -13.37%-13.33% | -29.09%-17.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWX DBAW | 50d72d | 69d65d | 43d84d | 906d576d |
Trading data
ACWX | DBAW | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $74.63 | $47.23 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $74.15 | $47.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.63 | $47.23 |
| 1D performance | +0.65% | +0.28% |
| AuM | $17.90 B | $338.66 M |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1792 | 1678 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2008 | January 22, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWX
Japan
14.02%
Taiwan
9.02%
Canada
8.14%
United Kingdom
8.1%
Other
60.72%
DBAW
Japan
13.83%
Taiwan
8.84%
Canada
8.1%
United Kingdom
7.95%
Other
61.28%
Sectors
ACWX
Finance
27%
Technology
22.65%
Industrials
11.89%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.83%
Other
30.63%
DBAW
Finance
26.72%
Technology
22.13%
Industrials
11.84%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.65%
Other
31.65%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACWX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.87%
DBAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
ACWX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.93%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.35%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.78%
ASML Holding NV
1.73%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.94%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.93%
Roche Holding AG
0.81%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.75%
Novartis AG
0.74%
Shell Plc
0.67%
Nestlé SA
0.66%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.65%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.65%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.65%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.64%
DBAW
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.88%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.27%
ASML Holding NV
1.74%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.72%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.93%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.92%
Roche Holding AG
0.81%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.74%
Novartis AG
0.72%
Shell Plc
0.65%
Nestlé SA
0.65%
Siemens AG
0.64%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.64%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.64%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.63%
Frequently asked questions about ACWX and DBAW
How have the ACWX and DBAW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, ACWX is up 11.84% year-to-date (YTD), while DBAW has returned 13.79%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWX or DBAW?
Year-to-date, the ACWX ETF saw +$9.22B in flows, compared to +$88M for DBAW.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWX or DBAW?
Over the past year, ACWX had a volatility of 16.87%, while DBAW experienced 12.29%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWX or DBAW?
As of October 27, 2026, ACWX holds $17.90 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBAW manages $338.66 M.
What sectors do the ACWX and DBAW ETFs invest in?
ACWX leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, DBAW focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACWX ETF and DBAW ETF?
ACWX top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. DBAW holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWX or DBAW?
ACWX holds 1856 securities with 18.87% of its assets in the top 15. DBAW has 2086 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.59%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
