Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACWXvsDBAWETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. ACWX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.4% for DBAW. ACWX is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$744M in YTD flows. DBAW performs better with 4.92% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWX and DBAW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACWX vs DBAW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWX DBAW | -4.54%-2.32% | +5.73%+6.58% | +4.77%+4.92% | +30.42%+26.82% | +64.34%+66.77% | +45.36%+71.22% |
| Flows | ACWX DBAW | +$387M- | +$929M+$6M | +$744M- | +$2.34B+$34M | +$2.34B+$31M | +$3.60B+$67M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWX DBAW | +14.83%+11.71% | +15.26%+12.32% | +13.45%+10.41% | +14.94%+10.85% |
| Max drawdown | ACWX DBAW | -7.09%-6.77% | -13.37%-13.17% | -13.37%-13.33% | -30.01%-17.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWX DBAW | 14d9d | 43d55d | 43d84d | 1065d576d |
ACWX | DBAW | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $70.22 | $43.36 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $70.29 | $43.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $70.22 | $43.36 |
| 1D performance | -0.10% | +0.32% |
| AuM | $8.97 B | $232.67 M |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.4% |
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1591 | 1704 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2008 | January 22, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACWX and DBAW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ACWX is up 4.77% year-to-date (YTD), while DBAW has returned 4.92%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWX or DBAW?
Year-to-date, the ACWX ETF saw +$744M in flows, compared to - for DBAW.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWX or DBAW?
Over the past year, ACWX had a volatility of 15.26%, while DBAW experienced 12.32%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWX or DBAW?
As of March 11, 2026, ACWX holds $8.97 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBAW manages $232.67 M.
What sectors do the ACWX and DBAW ETFs invest in?
ACWX leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, DBAW focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACWX ETF and DBAW ETF?
ACWX top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR. DBAW holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWX or DBAW?
ACWX holds 1731 securities with 16.93% of its assets in the top 15. DBAW has 1846 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.39%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
