ACWXvsDBAWETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
-0.48%
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. ACWX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.4% for DBAW. ACWX is up 9.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.36B in YTD flows. DBAW performs better with 9.23% YTD performance, and +$9M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWX and DBAW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWX vs DBAW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWX DBAW | +10.26%+7.70% | +1.67%+3.85% | +9.02%+9.23% | +32.55%+34.67% | +61.06%+67.83% | +47.42%+72.54% |
| Flows | ACWX DBAW | +$952M+$9M | +$2.01B+$9M | +$2.36B+$9M | +$3.16B+$31M | +$4.02B+$40M | +$4.87B+$72M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWX DBAW | +21.22%+16.11% | +14.01%+10.35% | +14.05%+10.85% | +15.34%+11.13% |
| Max drawdown | ACWX DBAW | -11.33%-8.71% | -11.33%-8.71% | -13.37%-13.33% | -30.01%-17.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWX DBAW | 61d58d | 61d58d | 43d84d | 1065d576d |
Trading data
ACWX | DBAW | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $72.66 | $44.99 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $73.19 | $45.14 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $72.66 | $44.99 |
| 1D performance | -0.72% | -0.33% |
| AuM | $11.05 B | $251.21 M |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1566 | 1703 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2008 | January 22, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWX
Japan
13.55%
United Kingdom
8.88%
Canada
8.6%
Other
68.97%
DBAW
Japan
13.86%
United Kingdom
8.76%
Canada
8.26%
Other
69.12%
Sectors
ACWX
Financials
23.22%
Information Techn.
15.46%
Industrials
13.37%
Consumer Discreti.
8.22%
Other
39.73%
DBAW
Financials
22.74%
Information Techn.
15.9%
Industrials
13.35%
Consumer Discreti.
8.26%
Other
39.76%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACWX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.79%
DBAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.93%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
ACWX
TWN SEMICONT MAN
4.07%
SAMSUNG ELECTR
1.55%
ASML HOLDING
1.50%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
1.19%
ASTRAZENECA
0.89%
SK HYNIX
0.86%
NOVARTIS
0.86%
CH1499059983
0.83%
HSBC HOLDINGS
0.83%
SHELL PLC
0.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
0.79%
NESTLE SA
0.76%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.68%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.58%
TOYOTA
0.57%
DBAW
TWN SEMICONT MAN
4.14%
SAMSUNG ELECTR
1.66%
ASML HOLDING
1.51%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
1.19%
SK HYNIX
0.99%
ASTRAZENECA
0.87%
NOVARTIS
0.83%
CH1499059983
0.81%
HSBC HOLDINGS
0.81%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
0.80%
SHELL PLC
0.77%
NESTLE SA
0.72%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.65%
TOYOTA
0.59%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.59%
Frequently asked questions about ACWX and DBAW
How have the ACWX and DBAW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, ACWX is up 9.02% year-to-date (YTD), while DBAW has returned 9.23%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWX or DBAW?
Year-to-date, the ACWX ETF saw +$2.36B in flows, compared to +$9M for DBAW.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWX or DBAW?
Over the past year, ACWX had a volatility of 14.01%, while DBAW experienced 10.35%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWX or DBAW?
As of April 27, 2026, ACWX holds $11.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBAW manages $251.21 M.
What sectors do the ACWX and DBAW ETFs invest in?
ACWX leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, DBAW focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACWX ETF and DBAW ETF?
ACWX top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and ASML HOLDING. DBAW holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and ASML HOLDING.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWX or DBAW?
ACWX holds 1705 securities with 16.79% of its assets in the top 15. DBAW has 1853 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.93%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
