ACWXvsDBAWETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
+0.42%
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) and Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. ACWX is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.4% for DBAW. ACWX is up 12.11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.48B in YTD flows. DBAW performs better with 15.59% YTD performance, and +$30M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWX and DBAW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWX vs DBAW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWX DBAW | -1.62%-0.40% | +2.84%+5.46% | +12.11%+15.59% | +24.46%+29.63% | +59.96%+70.38% | +53.34%+82.25% |
| Flows | ACWX DBAW | -+$17M | +$122M+$21M | +$2.48B+$30M | +$3.27B+$48M | +$4.13B+$62M | +$4.90B+$83M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWX DBAW | +19.97%+13.40% | +16.36%+11.78% | +14.75%+11.22% | +15.73%+11.34% |
| Max drawdown | ACWX DBAW | -5.36%-4.26% | -11.33%-8.71% | -13.37%-13.33% | -29.68%-17.38% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWX DBAW | 15d35d | 69d65d | 43d84d | 979d576d |
Trading data
ACWX | DBAW | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 4:19 PM | $74.18 | $47.18 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $74.43 | $47.45 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 4:19 PM
Live
Closed
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $74.18 | $47.18 |
| 1D performance | -0.34% | -0.57% |
| AuM | $11.36 B | $287.07 M |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
ACWX | DBAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1787 | 1985 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 26, 2008 | January 22, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWX
Japan
13.7%
Taiwan
9.12%
Republic of Korea
7.92%
United Kingdom
7.87%
Canada
7.84%
Other
53.54%
DBAW
Japan
13.59%
Taiwan
9.05%
Republic of Korea
7.86%
Canada
7.72%
United Kingdom
7.71%
Other
54.08%
Sectors
ACWX
Finance
26.13%
Technology
24.67%
Industrials
11.88%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.13%
Other
30.19%
DBAW
Finance
25.65%
Technology
24.07%
Industrials
11.62%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.04%
Other
31.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACWX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.34%
DBAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.88%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ACWX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.03%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.72%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.55%
ASML Holding NV
2.06%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.91%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.87%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.78%
Roche Holding AG
0.78%
Novartis AG
0.78%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.76%
Nestlé SA
0.72%
Siemens AG
0.64%
Shell Plc
0.59%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
0.57%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.57%
DBAW
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.95%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.78%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.49%
ASML Holding NV
1.84%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.92%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.86%
Roche Holding AG
0.77%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.75%
Novartis AG
0.75%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.74%
Nestlé SA
0.70%
Siemens AG
0.61%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.58%
Shell Plc
0.58%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.57%
Frequently asked questions about ACWX and DBAW
How have the ACWX and DBAW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, ACWX is up 12.11% year-to-date (YTD), while DBAW has returned 15.59%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWX or DBAW?
Year-to-date, the ACWX ETF saw +$2.48B in flows, compared to +$30M for DBAW.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWX or DBAW?
Over the past year, ACWX had a volatility of 16.36%, while DBAW experienced 11.78%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWX or DBAW?
As of July 27, 2026, ACWX holds $11.36 B in assets under management (AUM), while DBAW manages $287.07 M.
What sectors do the ACWX and DBAW ETFs invest in?
ACWX leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, DBAW focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACWX ETF and DBAW ETF?
ACWX top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. DBAW holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWX or DBAW?
ACWX holds 1856 securities with 20.34% of its assets in the top 15. DBAW has 2066 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.88%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
