ACWVvsQWLDETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QWLD
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
-0.5%
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) is part of the DM Large & Mid Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. ACWV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.3% for QWLD. ACWV is up 3.55% year-to-date (YTD) with -$131M in YTD flows. QWLD performs better with 7.56% YTD performance, and -$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWV and QWLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWV vs QWLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWV QWLD | +1.91%+1.33% | +0.64%+2.35% | +3.55%+7.56% | +5.82%+16.13% | +32.42%+53.46% | +31.43%+62.99% |
| Flows | ACWV QWLD | -$36M- | -$48M-$19M | -$131M-$15M | -$132M-$15M | -$2.40B+$32M | -$2.49B+$64M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWV QWLD | +6.80%+7.42% | +7.06%+8.33% | +8.21%+9.72% | +9.62%+11.84% |
| Max drawdown | ACWV QWLD | -1.96%-2.03% | -6.22%-7.55% | -7.33%-11.20% | -18.17%-22.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWV QWLD | 29d16d | 138d73d | 27d84d | 784d709d |
Trading data
ACWV | QWLD | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $121.72 | $153.12 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $122.00 | $153.75 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACWV | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACWV | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.72 | $153.12 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.41% |
| AuM | $3.25 B | $171.98 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
ACWV | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index | MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index |
| N° of holdings | 377 | 1226 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2011 | June 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWV
USA
55.74%
Japan
9.41%
Other
34.85%
QWLD
USA
64.02%
Japan
7.5%
Other
28.48%
Sectors
ACWV
Technology
25.02%
Finance
13.3%
Healthcare
12.96%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Telecommunication.
10.28%
Utilities
7.23%
Other
20.48%
QWLD
Technology
29.19%
Finance
16.21%
Healthcare
12.24%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.66%
Industrials
8.77%
Other
23.94%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACWV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.44%
QWLD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.08%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
ACWV
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.56%
Johnson & Johnson
1.40%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.24%
Microsoft Corp.
1.21%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.21%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.16%
The Southern Co.
1.08%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.03%
KDDI Corp.
1.01%
Cencora, Inc.
1.01%
Waste Management, Inc.
0.97%
McDonald's Corp.
0.90%
Chubb Ltd.
0.90%
PepsiCo, Inc.
0.89%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
0.89%
QWLD
Microsoft Corp.
2.80%
Apple, Inc.
2.46%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.32%
Broadcom Inc.
2.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.98%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.33%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.23%
Johnson & Johnson
1.19%
ASML Holding NV
1.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.09%
Visa, Inc.
1.08%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.07%
Novartis AG
0.81%
Walmart, Inc.
0.78%
Procter & Gamble Co.
0.77%
Frequently asked questions about ACWV and QWLD
How have the ACWV and QWLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, ACWV is up 3.55% year-to-date (YTD), while QWLD has returned 7.56%. That puts QWLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWV or QWLD?
Year-to-date, the ACWV ETF saw -$131M in flows, compared to -$15M for QWLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWV or QWLD?
Over the past year, ACWV had a volatility of 7.06%, while QWLD experienced 8.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWV or QWLD?
As of July 17, 2026, ACWV holds $3.25 B in assets under management (AUM), while QWLD manages $171.98 M.
What sectors do the ACWV and QWLD ETFs invest in?
ACWV leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QWLD focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the ACWV ETF and QWLD ETF?
ACWV top holdings include Cisco Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. QWLD holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWV or QWLD?
ACWV holds 378 securities with 16.44% of its assets in the top 15. QWLD has 1239 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.08%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
