ACWVvsQUSETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. ACWV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.15% for QUS. ACWV is up 1.22% year-to-date (YTD) with -$107M in YTD flows. QUS performs better with 3.43% YTD performance, and -$113M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWV and QUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWV vs QUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWV QUS | +1.92%+6.92% | -0.30%+1.31% | +1.22%+3.43% | +5.52%+18.83% | +29.11%+59.62% | +31.95%+66.78% |
| Flows | ACWV QUS | -$109M-$90M | -$107M-$120M | -$107M-$113M | -$249M-$212M | -$2.10B-$53M | -$2.64B-$16M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWV QUS | +8.41%+11.11% | +7.33%+9.63% | +8.23%+11.87% | +9.66%+14.43% |
| Max drawdown | ACWV QUS | -6.22%-6.87% | -6.22%-6.87% | -7.33%-13.88% | -18.17%-22.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWV QUS | 59d59d | 59d59d | 27d128d | 784d701d |
Trading data
ACWV | QUS | |
Last sale 5/1/2026 at 2:13 PM | $121.53 | $182.03 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $121.02 | $180.11 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of April 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACWV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 5/1/2026 at 2:13 PM
Live
Closed
ACWV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.53 | $182.03 |
| 1D performance | +0.42% | +1.07% |
| AuM | $3.23 B | $1.47 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
ACWV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index | MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 367 | 500 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2011 | April 15, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWV
USA
56%
Japan
10.2%
Other
33.8%
QUS
USA
94.79%
Other
5.21%
Sectors
ACWV
Information Techn.
21.41%
Health Care
13.54%
Financials
12.98%
Communication Ser.
12.28%
Consumer Staples
10.03%
Utilities
8.09%
Other
21.67%
QUS
Information Techn.
26.49%
Health Care
13.98%
Financials
10.84%
Communication Ser.
9.44%
Consumer Staples
9.18%
Industrials
8.64%
Other
21.42%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACWV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.26%
QUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.36%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
ACWV
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.57%
CISCO-T
1.40%
DUKE ENERGY
1.32%
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS
1.27%
AMERISOURCEBERGEN
1.26%
SOUTHERN
1.16%
WASTE MANAGEMENT
1.08%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.07%
EXXON
1.06%
KDDI
1.03%
REPUBLIC SVCS
1.03%
MCDONALD'S
1.03%
AT&T
1.02%
PEPSICO U
0.98%
CHUBB LTD
0.97%
QUS
APPLE
2.86%
MICROSOFT-T
2.51%
NVIDIA
2.38%
META PLATFORMS
2.13%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.05%
VISA INCORPORATION
1.85%
LILLY
1.85%
EXXON
1.71%
WALMART INC
1.68%
MASTERCARD
1.53%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.48%
MERCK & CO INC
1.39%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.37%
COSTCO WHOLESALE
1.30%
CISCO-T
1.27%
Frequently asked questions about ACWV and QUS
How have the ACWV and QUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 29, 2026, ACWV is up 1.22% year-to-date (YTD), while QUS has returned 3.43%. That puts QUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWV or QUS?
Year-to-date, the ACWV ETF saw -$107M in flows, compared to -$113M for QUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWV or QUS?
Over the past year, ACWV had a volatility of 7.33%, while QUS experienced 9.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWV or QUS?
As of April 29, 2026, ACWV holds $3.23 B in assets under management (AUM), while QUS manages $1.47 B.
What sectors do the ACWV and QUS ETFs invest in?
ACWV leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Financials. Meanwhile, QUS focuses on Information Technology, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the ACWV ETF and QUS ETF?
ACWV top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON, CISCO-T and DUKE ENERGY. QUS holds in its top three: APPLE, MICROSOFT-T and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWV or QUS?
ACWV holds 386 securities with 17.26% of its assets in the top 15. QUS has 533 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.36%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
