ACWVvsQUSETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Healthcare. ACWV is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.15% for QUS. ACWV is up 3.55% year-to-date (YTD) with -$131M in YTD flows. QUS performs better with 8.32% YTD performance, and -$116M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWV and QUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWV vs QUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWV QUS | +1.91%+2.12% | +0.64%+4.39% | +3.55%+8.32% | +5.82%+16.49% | +32.42%+57.68% | +31.43%+70.01% |
| Flows | ACWV QUS | -$36M-$9M | -$48M-$3M | -$131M-$116M | -$132M-$245M | -$2.40B-$29M | -$2.49B-$33M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWV QUS | +6.80%+8.15% | +7.06%+9.17% | +8.21%+11.76% | +9.62%+14.38% |
| Max drawdown | ACWV QUS | -1.96%-2.01% | -6.22%-6.87% | -7.33%-13.88% | -18.17%-22.27% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWV QUS | 29d15d | 138d59d | 27d128d | 784d701d |
Trading data
ACWV | QUS | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $121.72 | $187.67 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $122.00 | $189.17 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACWV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACWV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $121.72 | $187.67 |
| 1D performance | -0.23% | -0.79% |
| AuM | $3.25 B | $1.52 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
ACWV | QUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index | MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 377 | 518 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2011 | April 15, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWV
USA
55.74%
Japan
9.41%
Other
34.85%
QUS
USA
95%
Other
5%
Sectors
ACWV
Technology
25.02%
Finance
13.3%
Healthcare
12.96%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Telecommunication.
10.28%
Utilities
7.23%
Other
20.48%
QUS
Technology
33.73%
Finance
15.42%
Healthcare
13.13%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.93%
Other
26.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACWV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.44%
QUS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.81%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
ACWV
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.56%
Johnson & Johnson
1.40%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.24%
Microsoft Corp.
1.21%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.21%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.16%
The Southern Co.
1.08%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.03%
KDDI Corp.
1.01%
Cencora, Inc.
1.01%
Waste Management, Inc.
0.97%
McDonald's Corp.
0.90%
Chubb Ltd.
0.90%
PepsiCo, Inc.
0.89%
Exxon Mobil Corp.
0.89%
QUS
Microsoft Corp.
3.40%
Apple, Inc.
3.10%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.69%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.39%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.16%
Visa, Inc.
1.78%
Johnson & Johnson
1.72%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.50%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.49%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.41%
Walmart, Inc.
1.38%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.33%
Merck & Co., Inc.
1.22%
Procter & Gamble Co.
1.16%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.09%
Frequently asked questions about ACWV and QUS
How have the ACWV and QUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, ACWV is up 3.55% year-to-date (YTD), while QUS has returned 8.32%. That puts QUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWV or QUS?
Year-to-date, the ACWV ETF saw -$131M in flows, compared to -$116M for QUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWV or QUS?
Over the past year, ACWV had a volatility of 7.06%, while QUS experienced 9.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWV or QUS?
As of July 17, 2026, ACWV holds $3.25 B in assets under management (AUM), while QUS manages $1.52 B.
What sectors do the ACWV and QUS ETFs invest in?
ACWV leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QUS focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the ACWV ETF and QUS ETF?
ACWV top holdings include Cisco Systems, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.. QUS holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWV or QUS?
ACWV holds 378 securities with 16.44% of its assets in the top 15. QUS has 521 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.81%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
