ACWVvsFPAGETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and FPA Global Equity ETF (FPAG) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. ACWV's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, FPAG's top sector exposures are Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare. ACWV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.86% for FPAG. ACWV is up 8.26% year-to-date (YTD) with -$131M in YTD flows. FPAG performs better with 13.73% YTD performance, and +$259M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWV and FPAG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWV vs FPAG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWV FPAG | +2.31%+0.21% | +4.98%+5.76% | +8.26%+13.73% | +8.88%+21.03% | +40.61%+77.80% | +32.17%n/a |
| Flows | ACWV FPAG | -+$34M | -$24M+$69M | -$131M+$259M | -$97M+$309M | -$2.33B+$456M | -$2.49B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWV FPAG | +7.20%+13.64% | +6.99%+13.64% | +8.21%+14.37% | +9.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ACWV FPAG | -1.85%-3.55% | -6.22%-11.52% | -7.33%-16.98% | -18.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWV FPAG | 29d16d | 148d94d | 27d104d | 784dn/a |
Trading data
ACWV | FPAG | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 3:19 PM | $128.09 | $42.45 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $127.42 | $42.01 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
FPAG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexACWV | FPAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 3:19 PM
Live
Closed
ACWV | FPAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $128.09 | $42.45 |
| 1D performance | +0.52% | +1.05% |
| AuM | $3.40 B | $613.36 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.86% |
Characteristics
ACWV | FPAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | First Pacific Advisors |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 377 | 9670 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2011 | December 17, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWV
USA
55.04%
Japan
9.99%
Other
34.97%
FPAG
USA
52.44%
Netherlands
10.53%
Ireland
7.43%
Other
29.6%
Sectors
ACWV
Technology
23.72%
Finance
14.27%
Healthcare
13.81%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Telecommunication.
9.99%
Utilities
7.16%
Other
20.31%
FPAG
Technology
20.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
14.15%
Healthcare
11.99%
Industrials
10.5%
Finance
10.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.38%
Other
21.86%
Diversification
ACWV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.78%
FPAG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
46.57%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ACWV
Johnson & Johnson
1.56%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.21%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.20%
Microsoft Corp.
1.17%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
KDDI Corp.
1.10%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.10%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.08%
The Southern Co.
1.08%
Waste Management, Inc.
1.02%
Chubb Ltd.
0.98%
US30233Q1085
0.94%
McKesson Corp.
0.89%
Novartis AG
0.89%
FPAG
Alphabet, Inc.
4.32%
US9220408457
3.89%
Analog Devices, Inc.
3.67%
Heineken Holding NV
3.64%
International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.
3.51%
Citigroup, Inc.
3.30%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.14%
Safran SA
2.96%
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
2.85%
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
2.76%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.71%
The Magnum Ice Cream Co. N.V.
2.51%
Glencore Plc
2.50%
Comcast Corp.
2.40%
Aon Plc
2.40%
Frequently asked questions about ACWV and FPAG
How have the ACWV and FPAG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, ACWV is up 8.26% year-to-date (YTD), while FPAG has returned 13.73%. That puts FPAG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWV or FPAG?
Year-to-date, the ACWV ETF saw -$131M in flows, compared to +$259M for FPAG.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWV or FPAG?
Over the past year, ACWV had a volatility of 6.99%, while FPAG experienced 13.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWV or FPAG?
As of September 2, 2026, ACWV holds $3.40 B in assets under management (AUM), while FPAG manages $613.36 M.
What sectors do the ACWV and FPAG ETFs invest in?
ACWV leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FPAG focuses on Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the ACWV ETF and FPAG ETF?
ACWV top holdings include Johnson & Johnson, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Duke Energy Corp.. FPAG holds in its top three: Alphabet, Inc., US9220408457 and Analog Devices, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWV or FPAG?
ACWV holds 379 securities with 16.78% of its assets in the top 15. FPAG has 10019 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.57%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
