ACWVvsDGTETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) belongs to the Global Blended Cap segment. State Street SPDR Global Dow ETF (DGT) is part of the Global Large Cap segment. ACWV's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, DGT's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. ACWV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.5% for DGT. ACWV is up 8.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$131M in YTD flows. DGT performs better with 16.12% YTD performance, and +$61M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWV and DGT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWV vs DGT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWV DGT | +2.30%+2.88% | +5.30%+3.13% | +8.25%+16.12% | +9.06%+25.07% | +40.08%+84.77% | +33.33%+96.47% |
| Flows | ACWV DGT | -+$5M | -$24M-$9M | -$131M+$61M | -$97M+$90M | -$2.33B+$278M | -$2.49B+$338M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWV DGT | +7.21%+9.44% | +7.00%+10.43% | +8.22%+11.22% | +9.64%+12.95% |
| Max drawdown | ACWV DGT | -1.85%-3.03% | -6.22%-8.03% | -7.33%-13.93% | -18.17%-24.55% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWV DGT | 29d10d | 148d59d | 27d83d | 784d518d |
Trading data
ACWV | DGT | |
Last sale 8/31/2026 at 4:55 PM | $127.30 | $191.43 |
| Previous close 08/28/2026 | $127.40 | $191.20 |
| Consolidated volume 08/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACWV | DGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/31/2026 at 4:55 PM
Live
Closed
ACWV | DGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $127.30 | $191.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.08% | +0.12% |
| AuM | $3.40 B | $631.67 M |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
ACWV | DGT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | iShares | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index | The Global Dow Index |
| N° of holdings | 377 | 146 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2011 | September 25, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWV
USA
55.04%
Japan
9.99%
Other
34.97%
DGT
USA
50.04%
Japan
7.63%
United Kingdom
7.17%
Other
35.15%
Sectors
ACWV
Technology
23.72%
Finance
14.27%
Healthcare
13.81%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Telecommunication.
9.99%
Utilities
7.16%
Other
20.31%
DGT
Technology
19.39%
Finance
18.48%
Industrials
11.06%
Healthcare
10.73%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.4%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.93%
Other
22.01%
Diversification
ACWV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.78%
DGT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.11%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ACWV
Johnson & Johnson
1.56%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.21%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.20%
Microsoft Corp.
1.17%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
KDDI Corp.
1.10%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.10%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.08%
The Southern Co.
1.08%
Waste Management, Inc.
1.02%
Chubb Ltd.
0.98%
US30233Q1085
0.94%
McKesson Corp.
0.89%
Novartis AG
0.89%
DGT
Intel Corp.
2.02%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.65%
ASML Holding NV
1.15%
ArcelorMittal SA
1.12%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.11%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.07%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
0.95%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.94%
FedEx Corp.
0.93%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.87%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.87%
Rio Tinto Plc
0.86%
Merck & Co., Inc.
0.86%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
0.86%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.85%
Frequently asked questions about ACWV and DGT
How have the ACWV and DGT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of August 28, 2026, ACWV is up 8.25% year-to-date (YTD), while DGT has returned 16.12%. That puts DGT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWV or DGT?
Year-to-date, the ACWV ETF saw -$131M in flows, compared to +$61M for DGT.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWV or DGT?
Over the past year, ACWV had a volatility of 7%, while DGT experienced 10.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWV or DGT?
As of August 28, 2026, ACWV holds $3.40 B in assets under management (AUM), while DGT manages $631.67 M.
What sectors do the ACWV and DGT ETFs invest in?
ACWV leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, DGT focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ACWV ETF and DGT ETF?
ACWV top holdings include Johnson & Johnson, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Duke Energy Corp.. DGT holds in its top three: Intel Corp., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWV or DGT?
ACWV holds 379 securities with 16.78% of its assets in the top 15. DGT has 151 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.11%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
