ACWVvsCGDGETF Comparison
VS
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) and Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF (CGDG) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. ACWV's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. In contrast, CGDG's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. ACWV is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.47% for CGDG. ACWV is up 8.26% year-to-date (YTD) with -$131M in YTD flows. CGDG performs better with 9.6% YTD performance, and +$1.31B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWV and CGDG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACWV vs CGDG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWV CGDG | +2.31%+0.52% | +4.98%+4.69% | +8.26%+9.60% | +8.88%+16.63% | +40.61%n/a | +32.17%n/a |
| Flows | ACWV CGDG | -+$154M | -$24M+$454M | -$131M+$1.31B | -$97M+$1.95B | -$2.33B- | -$2.49B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWV CGDG | +7.20%+7.65% | +6.99%+9.60% | +8.21%n/a | +9.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ACWV CGDG | -1.85%-1.34% | -6.22%-7.39% | -7.33%n/a | -18.17%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWV CGDG | 29d12d | 148d117d | 27dn/a | 784dn/a |
Trading data
ACWV | CGDG | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 4:39 PM | $128.36 | $38.82 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $127.42 | $38.59 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CGDG
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexACWV | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 4:39 PM
Live
Closed
ACWV | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $128.36 | $38.82 |
| 1D performance | +0.74% | +0.60% |
| AuM | $3.40 B | $5.67 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.47% |
Characteristics
ACWV | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | iShares | Capital Group |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 377 | 102 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 18, 2011 | September 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACWV
USA
55.04%
Japan
9.99%
Other
34.97%
CGDG
USA
50.21%
United Kingdom
9.77%
Other
40.02%
Sectors
ACWV
Technology
23.72%
Finance
14.27%
Healthcare
13.81%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Telecommunication.
9.99%
Utilities
7.16%
Other
20.31%
CGDG
Finance
23.84%
Technology
14.74%
Healthcare
11.34%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.28%
Industrials
9.13%
Other
29.67%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACWV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.78%
CGDG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
ACWV
Johnson & Johnson
1.56%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.21%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.20%
Microsoft Corp.
1.17%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
KDDI Corp.
1.10%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.10%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.08%
The Southern Co.
1.08%
Waste Management, Inc.
1.02%
Chubb Ltd.
0.98%
US30233Q1085
0.94%
McKesson Corp.
0.89%
Novartis AG
0.89%
CGDG
Broadcom Inc.
4.15%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
3.96%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
3.89%
AstraZeneca PLC
2.36%
Welltower, Inc.
2.17%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund
2.06%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.96%
British American Tobacco plc
1.89%
TotalEnergies SE
1.85%
RTX Corp.
1.65%
Iberdrola SA
1.48%
ONEOK, Inc.
1.44%
Mondelez International, Inc.
1.42%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.41%
Royal Caribbean Group
1.40%
Frequently asked questions about ACWV and CGDG
How have the ACWV and CGDG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, ACWV is up 8.26% year-to-date (YTD), while CGDG has returned 9.6%. That puts CGDG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWV or CGDG?
Year-to-date, the ACWV ETF saw -$131M in flows, compared to +$1.31B for CGDG.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWV or CGDG?
Over the past year, ACWV had a volatility of 6.99%, while CGDG experienced 9.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWV or CGDG?
As of September 2, 2026, ACWV holds $3.40 B in assets under management (AUM), while CGDG manages $5.67 B.
What sectors do the ACWV and CGDG ETFs invest in?
ACWV leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Healthcare. Meanwhile, CGDG focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the ACWV ETF and CGDG ETF?
ACWV top holdings include Johnson & Johnson, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Duke Energy Corp.. CGDG holds in its top three: Broadcom Inc., Philip Morris International, Inc. and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWV or CGDG?
ACWV holds 379 securities with 16.78% of its assets in the top 15. CGDG has 104 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.09%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACWV & CGDG
A Close Look at Capital Group's 5 New Active ETFs Listed on NYSE ARCA
October 26, 2023
CGDG
Advertisement
Advertisement
