Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACWIvsKLMTETF Comparison
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF (KLMT) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. ACWI's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. In contrast, KLMT's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. ACWI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.32%, versus 0.1% for KLMT. ACWI is down -0.74% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2.87B in YTD flows. KLMT performs worse with -1.04% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACWI and KLMT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACWI vs KLMT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACWI KLMT | -3.51%-3.58% | -0.02%-0.30% | -0.74%-1.04% | +22.54%+21.29% | +71.80%n/a | +61.28%n/a |
| Flows | ACWI KLMT | +$1.76B- | +$3.68B- | +$2.87B- | +$5.06B-$3M | +$712M- | +$4.69B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACWI KLMT | +12.67%+12.35% | +16.65%+17.00% | +13.73%n/a | +15.57%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ACWI KLMT | -5.42%-5.49% | -13.45%-13.65% | -16.56%n/a | -26.35%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ACWI KLMT | 15d15d | 45d45d | 87dn/a | 750dn/a |
ACWI | KLMT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $140.45 | $30.63 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $142.94 | $31.17 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ACWI | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ACWI | KLMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $140.45 | $30.63 |
| 1D performance | -1.74% | -1.75% |
| AuM | $27.77 B | $1.39 B |
| E/R | 0.32% | 0.1% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACWI and KLMT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ACWI is down -0.74% year-to-date (YTD), while KLMT has lost -1.04%. That puts ACWI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACWI or KLMT?
Year-to-date, the ACWI ETF saw +$2.87B in flows, compared to - for KLMT.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACWI or KLMT?
Over the past year, ACWI had a volatility of 16.65%, while KLMT experienced 17%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACWI or KLMT?
As of March 12, 2026, ACWI holds $27.77 B in assets under management (AUM), while KLMT manages $1.39 B.
What sectors do the ACWI and KLMT ETFs invest in?
ACWI leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Industrials. Meanwhile, KLMT focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ACWI ETF and KLMT ETF?
ACWI top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. KLMT holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACWI or KLMT?
ACWI holds 2264 securities with 27.6% of its assets in the top 15. KLMT has 502 securities and a top 15 weight of 28.44%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
