Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACSIvsQLCETF Comparison
American Customer Satisfaction Core Alpha ETF - USD (ACSI) belongs to the US All Cap segment. FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index ETF (QLC) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. ACSI's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, QLC's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. ACSI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.26% for QLC. ACSI is down -2.2% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QLC performs better with -1.54% YTD performance, and +$89M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACSI and QLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACSI vs QLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACSI QLC | -1.67%-1.73% | -2.51%-1.28% | -2.20%-1.54% | +12.93%+26.37% | +60.33%+92.72% | +46.21%+96.09% |
| Flows | ACSI QLC | -+$23M | -+$95M | -+$89M | +$13K+$339M | -$258K+$496M | -$3M+$529M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACSI QLC | +10.69%+12.73% | +15.70%+18.31% | +13.70%+14.98% | +16.71%+16.91% |
| Max drawdown | ACSI QLC | -4.68%-4.48% | -10.46%-13.70% | -15.49%-18.73% | -24.94%-23.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACSI QLC | 59d31d | 45d45d | 153d124d | 854d702d |
ACSI | QLC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.16 | $79.18 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $66.16 | $79.76 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ACSI | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ACSI | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.16 | $79.18 |
| 1D performance | -1.51% | -0.73% |
| AuM | $101.04 M | $797.04 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.26% |
ACSI | QLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Exponential ETFs | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index | Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 163 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 1, 2016 | September 23, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACSI and QLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ACSI is down -2.2% year-to-date (YTD), while QLC has lost -1.54%. That puts QLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACSI or QLC?
Year-to-date, the ACSI ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$89M for QLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACSI or QLC?
Over the past year, ACSI had a volatility of 15.7%, while QLC experienced 18.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACSI or QLC?
As of March 12, 2026, ACSI holds $101.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while QLC manages $797.04 M.
What sectors do the ACSI and QLC ETFs invest in?
ACSI leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, QLC focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the ACSI ETF and QLC ETF?
ACSI top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, AMAZON.COM INC and MICROSOFT-T. QLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACSI or QLC?
ACSI holds 33 securities with 57.43% of its assets in the top 15. QLC has 166 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.62%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
