Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACSIvsQARPETF Comparison
Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF
American Customer Satisfaction Core Alpha ETF - USD (ACSI) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. ACSI's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, QARP's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. ACSI is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.19% for QARP. ACSI is down -2.2% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QARP performs better with 2.88% YTD performance, and -$11M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACSI and QARP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACSI vs QARP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACSI QARP | -1.67%-2.51% | -2.51%+2.36% | -2.20%+2.88% | +12.93%+19.88% | +60.33%+70.38% | +46.21%+77.88% |
| Flows | ACSI QARP | --$8M | --$11M | --$11M | +$13K+$2M | -$258K+$35M | -$3M-$4M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACSI QARP | +10.69%+9.72% | +15.70%+15.67% | +13.70%+12.84% | +16.71%+15.54% |
| Max drawdown | ACSI QARP | -4.68%-3.05% | -10.46%-11.48% | -15.49%-15.60% | -24.94%-22.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACSI QARP | 59d14d | 45d45d | 153d155d | 854d572d |
ACSI | QARP | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.16 | $60.03 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $66.16 | $60.71 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ACSI | QARP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ACSI | QARP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.16 | $60.03 |
| 1D performance | -1.51% | -1.12% |
| AuM | $101.04 M | $72.88 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.19% |
ACSI | QARP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Exponential ETFs | Xtrackers by DWS |
| Benchmark | American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index | Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 33 | 914 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 1, 2016 | April 15, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACSI and QARP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ACSI is down -2.2% year-to-date (YTD), while QARP has returned 2.88%. That puts QARP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACSI or QARP?
Year-to-date, the ACSI ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$11M for QARP.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACSI or QARP?
Over the past year, ACSI had a volatility of 15.7%, while QARP experienced 15.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACSI or QARP?
As of March 12, 2026, ACSI holds $101.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while QARP manages $72.88 M.
What sectors do the ACSI and QARP ETFs invest in?
ACSI leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, QARP focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the ACSI ETF and QARP ETF?
ACSI top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, AMAZON.COM INC and MICROSOFT-T. QARP holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and AMAZON.COM INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACSI or QARP?
ACSI holds 33 securities with 57.43% of its assets in the top 15. QARP has 1008 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.72%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
