New

Create, analyze, optimize your ETF portfolio. Start now →

Advertisement

ACLOvsMBBAETF Comparison

ETF 1
ACLO

TCW AAA CLO ETF

This fund is part of
US Corporate IG Bonds
-0.22%
VS
ETF 2
MBBA

iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF

This fund is part of
MBS & ABS
-0.37%

TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) and iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. ACLO's top 2 sector exposures are Industrials and Finance. In contrast, MBBA's top sector exposures are Industrials and Non-Corporate. ACLO is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.26% for MBBA. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACLO and MBBA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

ACLO vs MBBA performance and flow charts

Performance

-0.6-0.4-0.20.00.20.40.6%Jul 28Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25

Cumulative Flows

0 M10 M20 M30 M40 M50 M60 MJul 28Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 08/28/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
ACLO
MBBA
+0.46%-0.12%
+1.28%-0.46%
+3.33%n/a
+5.15%n/a
n/an/a
n/an/a
Flows
ACLO
MBBA
+$57M+$5M
+$74M+$35M
+$240M-
+$293M-
--
--
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
ACLO
MBBA
+0.21%+4.72%
+0.30%n/a
n/an/a
n/an/a
Max drawdown
ACLO
MBBA
n/a-2.02%
n/an/a
n/an/a
n/an/a
Max drawdown duration
ACLO
MBBA
n/a60d
n/an/a
n/an/a
n/an/a
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
ACLO
MBBA
Last sale
8/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
$50.53
$48.76
Previous close
08/28/2026
$50.53
$48.87
Consolidated volume
08/28/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACLO
MBBA
Last price
$50.53
$48.76
1D performance
+0.00%
-0.22%
AuM$577.83 M$157.46 M
E/R0.2%0.26%
Characteristics
ACLO
MBBA
Management strategyActiveActive
ProviderTCWiShares
Benchmark--
N° of holdings3825
Asset class--
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateNovember 15, 2024January 23, 2026
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

ACLO
USA
10.67%
Other
89.33%
MBBA
Data will be available soon

Sectors

ACLO
Industrials
9.22%
Other
90.78%
MBBA
Data will be available soon
Advertisement

Diversification

ACLO

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

14.5%
MBBA
Data will be available soon

Top 15 holdings

Data as of July 31, 2026
ACLO
Tcw Central Cash Fund
1.45%
US00173UAU88
1.07%
US77341AAA16
1.06%
US675943AA23
1.06%
US55820VAL71
1.06%
US38181YAC03
1.06%
US26252QAS12
1.02%
Golub Capital Partners CLO 2024-77A, FRN 25jan2038, USD (ABS, A)
0.96%
US67579AAW71
0.90%
US92915QBG73
0.82%
Trinitas CLO 2017-7A, FRN 25jan2035, USD (ABS, A1R)
0.82%
US863163AC59
0.82%
US09630QAU58
0.81%
US40440XAL55
0.79%
US06764CAA45
0.79%
MBBA
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about ACLO and MBBA

Which ETF is bigger: ACLO or MBBA?

As of August 28, 2026, ACLO holds $577.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while MBBA manages $157.46 M.

What sectors do the ACLO and MBBA ETFs invest in?

ACLO leans toward sectors like Industrials. Meanwhile, MBBA focuses on Industrials and Non-Corporate.

What are the top holdings of the ACLO ETF and MBBA ETF?

ACLO top holdings include Tcw Central Cash Fund, US00173UAU88 and US77341AAA16. MBBA holds in its top three: US01F0526800, US01F0206874 and BlackRock Liquidity T-Fund.

Which ETF is more diversified: ACLO or MBBA?

ACLO holds 317 securities with 14.5% of its assets in the top 15. MBBA has 491 securities and a top 15 weight of 89.36%.

Advertisement
Latest news about ACLO & MBBA
Advertisement
ETF Comparison Tool

Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?

Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.