Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACLCvsGSUSETF Comparison
American Century Sustainable Equity ETF (ACLC) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta U.S. Equity ETF (GSUS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. ACLC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, GSUS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. ACLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.09% for GSUS. ACLC is down -1.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. GSUS performs better with -1.15% YTD performance, and -$75M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACLC and GSUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACLC vs GSUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACLC GSUS | -2.79%-2.15% | -2.85%-1.93% | -1.81%-1.15% | +18.19%+23.24% | +63.33%+84.71% | +63.65%+81.58% |
| Flows | ACLC GSUS | +$9M-$75M | +$5M-$85M | +$3M-$75M | +$44M-$59M | +$86M+$1.03B | +$67M+$1.48B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACLC GSUS | +11.92%+11.62% | +18.57%+18.33% | +15.19%+14.95% | +17.29%+17.35% |
| Max drawdown | ACLC GSUS | -4.09%-3.51% | -13.74%-13.91% | -20.45%-19.14% | -26.40%-25.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACLC GSUS | 43d58d | 45d45d | 160d126d | 725d715d |
ACLC | GSUS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.57 | $91.32 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $76.83 | $91.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ACLC | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ACLC | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.57 | $91.32 |
| 1D performance | -1.64% | -0.63% |
| AuM | $276.70 M | $2.87 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.09% |
ACLC | GSUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | American Century Investments | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS United States Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 89 | 400 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 15, 2020 | May 12, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACLC and GSUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, ACLC is down -1.81% year-to-date (YTD), while GSUS has lost -1.15%. That puts GSUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACLC or GSUS?
Year-to-date, the ACLC ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$75M for GSUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACLC or GSUS?
Over the past year, ACLC had a volatility of 18.57%, while GSUS experienced 18.33%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACLC or GSUS?
As of March 11, 2026, ACLC holds $276.70 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSUS manages $2.87 B.
What sectors do the ACLC and GSUS ETFs invest in?
ACLC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSUS focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ACLC ETF and GSUS ETF?
ACLC top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL. GSUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACLC or GSUS?
ACLC holds 95 securities with 48.86% of its assets in the top 15. GSUS has 419 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.2%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
