Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ACIOvsIWLETF Comparison
Aptus Collared Income Opportunity ETF (ACIO) belongs to the Options Strategies segment. iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. ACIO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.15% for IWL. ACIO is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD) with -$28M in YTD flows. IWL performs worse with -3.82% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACIO and IWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ACIO vs IWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACIO IWL | -1.63%-2.58% | -2.12%-3.15% | -2.31%-3.82% | +11.84%+21.93% | +48.60%+86.48% | +58.57%+84.58% |
| Flows | ACIO IWL | -$6M-$17M | -$31M+$44M | -$28M+$19M | +$285M+$130M | +$1.21B+$464M | +$1.59B+$415M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACIO IWL | +7.48%+12.39% | +11.31%+18.67% | +9.98%+15.27% | +11.08%+17.22% |
| Max drawdown | ACIO IWL | -3.41%-5.35% | -8.15%-13.89% | -12.37%-19.22% | -13.98%-25.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACIO IWL | 60d60d | 45d45d | 155d126d | 688d707d |
ACIO | IWL | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.67 | $164.03 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $42.86 | $165.19 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ACIO | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ACIO | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.67 | $164.03 |
| 1D performance | -0.44% | -0.70% |
| AuM | $2.14 B | $1.97 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.15% |
ACIO | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | APTUS ETFs | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell Top 200 Index |
| N° of holdings | 125 | 191 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 10, 2019 | September 22, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ACIO and IWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, ACIO is down -2.31% year-to-date (YTD), while IWL has lost -3.82%. That puts ACIO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACIO or IWL?
Year-to-date, the ACIO ETF saw -$28M in flows, compared to +$19M for IWL.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACIO or IWL?
Over the past year, ACIO had a volatility of 11.31%, while IWL experienced 18.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACIO or IWL?
As of March 13, 2026, ACIO holds $2.14 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWL manages $1.97 B.
What sectors do the ACIO and IWL ETFs invest in?
ACIO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWL focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ACIO ETF and IWL ETF?
ACIO top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ACIO or IWL?
ACIO holds 130 securities with 48.19% of its assets in the top 15. IWL has 201 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.83%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
