ACESvsPBWETF Comparison
VS
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ACES's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, PBW's top sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. ACES is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.64% for PBW. ACES is down -6.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. PBW performs better with 2.31% YTD performance, and -$297M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACES and PBW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACES vs PBW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACES PBW | -12.61%-18.29% | -13.06%-13.81% | -6.26%+2.31% | +7.69%+29.54% | -34.02%-22.38% | -55.36%-57.71% |
| Flows | ACES PBW | -$2M-$15M | +$2M+$27M | +$10M-$297M | +$8M-$63M | -$200M-$147M | -$322M-$403M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACES PBW | +38.61%+50.84% | +34.70%+43.05% | +34.78%+41.20% | +36.49%+43.26% |
| Max drawdown | ACES PBW | -29.03%-33.47% | -29.03%-33.47% | -57.14%-67.97% | -74.39%-84.50% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACES PBW | 56d56d | 56d56d | 1093d1012d | 1730d1723d |
Trading data
ACES | PBW | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.54 | $29.87 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $30.51 | $31.10 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACES | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ACES | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.54 | $29.87 |
| 1D performance | -3.18% | -3.95% |
| AuM | $108.79 M | $383.14 M |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.64% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACES
USA
85.31%
Canada
9.61%
Other
5.09%
PBW
USA
80.33%
Other
19.67%
Sectors
ACES
Industrials
36.16%
Utilities
26.81%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.11%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.26%
Other
15.65%
PBW
Industrials
48.7%
Non-Energy Materi.
20.84%
Technology
13.52%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.97%
Other
8.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.02%
PBW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.83%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ACES
Tesla, Inc.
5.76%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.69%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
5.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
5.10%
Nextpower, Inc.
4.86%
Northland Power, Inc.
4.85%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.71%
Albemarle Corp.
4.66%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
4.61%
First Solar, Inc.
4.53%
Itron, Inc.
4.45%
Plug Power, Inc.
4.43%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
4.18%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.65%
Boralex, Inc.
3.13%
PBW
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
4.57%
Hyliion Holdings Corp.
2.98%
Navitas Semiconductor Corp.
2.41%
MYR Group, Inc.
2.23%
Bloom Energy Corp.
2.23%
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
2.21%
Powell Industries, Inc.
1.92%
IonQ, Inc.
1.85%
Preformed Line Products Co.
1.85%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
1.84%
Bel Fuse, Inc.
1.81%
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
1.80%
ioneer Ltd.
1.80%
D-Wave Quantum, Inc.
1.73%
First Solar, Inc.
1.61%
Frequently asked questions about ACES and PBW
How have the ACES and PBW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, ACES is down -6.26% year-to-date (YTD), while PBW has returned 2.31%. That puts PBW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACES or PBW?
Year-to-date, the ACES ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to -$297M for PBW.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACES or PBW?
Over the past year, ACES had a volatility of 34.7%, while PBW experienced 43.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACES or PBW?
As of July 28, 2026, ACES holds $108.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while PBW manages $383.14 M.
What sectors do the ACES and PBW ETFs invest in?
ACES leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, PBW focuses on Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the ACES ETF and PBW ETF?
ACES top holdings include Tesla, Inc., Rivian Automotive, Inc. and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.. PBW holds in its top three: FuelCell Energy, Inc., Hyliion Holdings Corp. and Navitas Semiconductor Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACES or PBW?
ACES holds 38 securities with 70.02% of its assets in the top 15. PBW has 68 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.83%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACES & PBW
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
PBW
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
ACES
PBW
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
PBW
Advertisement
Advertisement
