ACESvsLITETF Comparison
VS
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. ACES's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology. ACES is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.75% for LIT. ACES is down -5.25% year-to-date (YTD) with +$10M in YTD flows. LIT performs better with 6.7% YTD performance, and -$64M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ACES and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ACES vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACES LIT | -11.66%-10.65% | -13.94%-18.33% | -5.25%+6.70% | +8.86%+59.79% | -32.52%+9.25% | -53.47%-6.80% |
| Flows | ACES LIT | -$2M-$66M | +$2M-$118M | +$10M-$64M | +$8M-$67M | -$201M-$1.35B | -$322M-$1.19B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ACES LIT | +38.75%+29.62% | +34.75%+28.47% | +34.78%+26.42% | +36.51%+26.23% |
| Max drawdown | ACES LIT | -28.59%-25.43% | -28.59%-25.43% | -57.14%-49.84% | -74.39%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | ACES LIT | 55d77d | 55d77d | 1092d875d | 1729d1708d |
Trading data
ACES | LIT | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 5:39 PM | $30.31 | $67.06 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $30.74 | $68.63 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ACES | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/28/2026 at 5:39 PM
Live
Closed
ACES | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.31 | $67.06 |
| 1D performance | -1.40% | -2.29% |
| AuM | $109.97 M | $1.51 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ACES
USA
85.31%
Canada
9.61%
Other
5.09%
LIT
China
33.64%
United Kingdom
20.11%
Japan
12.05%
USA
11.43%
Republic of Korea
10.17%
Australia
7.24%
Other
5.36%
Sectors
ACES
Industrials
36.16%
Utilities
26.81%
Consumer Cyclical.
13.11%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.26%
Other
15.65%
LIT
Non-Energy Materi.
50.33%
Industrials
20.56%
Technology
14.95%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.24%
Other
6.92%
Advertisement
Diversification
ACES
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.02%
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ACES
Tesla, Inc.
5.76%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
5.69%
HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.
5.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
5.10%
Nextpower, Inc.
4.86%
Northland Power, Inc.
4.85%
Enphase Energy, Inc.
4.71%
Albemarle Corp.
4.66%
Clearway Energy, Inc.
4.61%
First Solar, Inc.
4.53%
Itron, Inc.
4.45%
Plug Power, Inc.
4.43%
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
4.18%
Sunrun, Inc.
3.65%
Boralex, Inc.
3.13%
LIT
Rio Tinto Plc
20.11%
NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd.
7.75%
Panasonic Holdings Corp.
6.13%
TDK Corp.
5.92%
Albemarle Corp.
4.51%
Tesla, Inc.
4.50%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
4.34%
EVE Energy Co., Ltd.
3.77%
Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Ltd.
3.69%
LG Energy Solution Ltd.
3.62%
PLS Group Ltd.
3.04%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
2.94%
Guangzhou Tinci Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
2.78%
BYD Co., Ltd.
2.73%
Frequently asked questions about ACES and LIT
How have the ACES and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 27, 2026, ACES is down -5.25% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 6.7%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ACES or LIT?
Year-to-date, the ACES ETF saw +$10M in flows, compared to -$64M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: ACES or LIT?
Over the past year, ACES had a volatility of 34.75%, while LIT experienced 28.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: ACES or LIT?
As of July 27, 2026, ACES holds $109.97 M in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.51 B.
What sectors do the ACES and LIT ETFs invest in?
ACES leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Consumer Cyclicals. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Non-Energy Materials, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the ACES ETF and LIT ETF?
ACES top holdings include Tesla, Inc., Rivian Automotive, Inc. and HA Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc.. LIT holds in its top three: Rio Tinto Plc, NAURA Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Panasonic Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: ACES or LIT?
ACES holds 38 securities with 70.02% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.8%.
Advertisement
Latest news about ACES & LIT
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
ACES
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
Advertisement
