Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ABOTvsQOWZETF Comparison
Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. ABOT's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. In contrast, QOWZ's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. ABOT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.39% for QOWZ. ABOT is down -10.65% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QOWZ performs better with -6.32% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ABOT and QOWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ABOT vs QOWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ABOT QOWZ | -0.95%-2.40% | -13.39%-8.33% | -10.65%-6.32% | +2.73%+7.36% | +59.50%n/a | +47.71%n/a |
| Flows | ABOT QOWZ | -- | --$9K | -- | -$3M-$3M | -$62M- | -$84M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ABOT QOWZ | +19.92%+15.75% | +21.50%+21.19% | +17.98%n/a | +19.61%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ABOT QOWZ | -17.54%-10.05% | -18.72%-13.59% | -22.58%n/a | -29.64%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ABOT QOWZ | 89d89d | 134d45d | 134dn/a | 801dn/a |
ABOT | QOWZ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.66 | $33.33 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $34.89 | $33.53 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ABOT | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ABOT | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.66 | $33.33 |
| 1D performance | -0.67% | -0.59% |
| AuM | $4.36 M | $13.42 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.39% |
ABOT | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Abacus FCF Advisors | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders Index | Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 8, 2020 | December 5, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ABOT and QOWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, ABOT is down -10.65% year-to-date (YTD), while QOWZ has lost -6.32%. That puts QOWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ABOT or QOWZ?
Year-to-date, the ABOT ETF saw - in flows, compared to - for QOWZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: ABOT or QOWZ?
Over the past year, ABOT had a volatility of 21.5%, while QOWZ experienced 21.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: ABOT or QOWZ?
As of March 10, 2026, ABOT holds $4.36 M in assets under management (AUM), while QOWZ manages $13.42 M.
What sectors do the ABOT and QOWZ ETFs invest in?
ABOT leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Communication Services. Meanwhile, QOWZ focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the ABOT ETF and QOWZ ETF?
ABOT top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and ALPHABET INC-CL. QOWZ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, META PLATFORMS and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: ABOT or QOWZ?
ABOT holds 49 securities with 45.03% of its assets in the top 15. QOWZ has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.33%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
