Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ABLSvsXSHQETF Comparison
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF (XSHQ) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. ABLS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, XSHQ's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. ABLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.29% for XSHQ. ABLS is down -9.48% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. XSHQ performs better with -1.27% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ABLS and XSHQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ABLS vs XSHQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ABLS XSHQ | -5.61%-6.09% | -12.64%-4.18% | -9.48%-1.27% | -5.41%+10.01% | n/a+31.41% | n/a+15.25% |
| Flows | ABLS XSHQ | --$5M | --$16M | --$13M | +$225K-$216M | -+$204M | -+$196M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ABLS XSHQ | +18.62%+16.23% | +21.80%+21.80% | n/a+20.23% | n/a+21.19% |
| Max drawdown | ABLS XSHQ | -12.64%-8.19% | -14.20%-13.47% | n/a-27.13% | n/a-27.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | ABLS XSHQ | 88d31d | 249d37d | n/a472d | n/a472d |
ABLS | XSHQ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.77 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $41.63 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ABLS | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ABLS | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $41.77 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.34% |
| AuM | $0.91 M | $231.15 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.29% |
ABLS | XSHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Abacus FCF Advisors | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 118 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 18, 2025 | April 6, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ABLS and XSHQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ABLS is down -9.48% year-to-date (YTD), while XSHQ has lost -1.27%. That puts XSHQ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ABLS or XSHQ?
Year-to-date, the ABLS ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$13M for XSHQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: ABLS or XSHQ?
Over the past year, ABLS had a volatility of 21.8%, while XSHQ experienced 21.8%.
Which ETF is bigger: ABLS or XSHQ?
As of March 12, 2026, ABLS holds $0.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while XSHQ manages $231.15 M.
What sectors do the ABLS and XSHQ ETFs invest in?
ABLS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, XSHQ focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ABLS ETF and XSHQ ETF?
ABLS top holdings include ARGAN, COLLEGIUM PHAR/D and ARTISAN PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. XSHQ holds in its top three: INTERDIGITAL, BRINKER INTERNATIONAL and ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: ABLS or XSHQ?
ABLS holds 50 securities with 53.41% of its assets in the top 15. XSHQ has 120 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.93%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
