ABLSvsIWOETF Comparison
VS
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) belongs to the US Small Cap segment. iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF (IWO) is part of the US Small Cap Growth segment. ABLS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, IWO's top sector exposures are Healthcare, Technology and Industrials. ABLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.24% for IWO. ABLS is up 14.34% year-to-date (YTD) with -$682K in YTD flows. IWO performs better with 14.96% YTD performance, and -$802M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ABLS and IWO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ABLS vs IWO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ABLS IWO | -3.14%-5.05% | +12.61%+2.39% | +14.34%+14.96% | +11.31%+28.34% | n/a+49.07% | n/a+28.02% |
| Flows | ABLS IWO | -$884K-$227M | -$884K-$46M | -$682K-$802M | -$682K-$600M | --$918M | --$489M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ABLS IWO | +17.11%+23.09% | +18.12%+22.54% | n/a+22.87% | n/a+24.70% |
| Max drawdown | ABLS IWO | -7.08%-7.65% | -15.92%-14.82% | n/a-28.47% | n/a-40.45% |
| Max drawdown duration | ABLS IWO | 24d31d | 265d84d | n/a280d | n/a1409d |
Trading data
ABLS | IWO | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $370.67 | |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $373.48 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ABLS | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ABLS | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $370.67 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.75% |
| AuM | $0.47 M | $14.30 B |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.24% |
Characteristics
ABLS | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Abacus FCF Advisors | iShares |
| Benchmark | Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index | Russell 2000 Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 46 | 1097 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 18, 2025 | July 24, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ABLS
USA
97.52%
Other
2.48%
IWO
USA
95.89%
Other
4.11%
Sectors
ABLS
Healthcare
25.1%
Finance
20.27%
Industrials
17.38%
Technology
16.19%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.09%
Other
13.97%
IWO
Healthcare
28.24%
Technology
19.26%
Industrials
14.93%
Finance
12.41%
Other
25.16%
Advertisement
Diversification
ABLS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
63.47%
IWO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
ABLS
Argan, Inc.
15.13%
Enova International, Inc.
5.59%
Oscar Health, Inc.
5.43%
Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc.
4.31%
Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc.
3.90%
Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
3.82%
Harmony Biosciences Holdings, Inc.
3.52%
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
3.25%
Progyny, Inc.
2.98%
World Acceptance Corp.
2.82%
Qualys, Inc.
2.80%
Pediatrix Medical Group, Inc.
2.58%
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.49%
Cohen & Steers, Inc. (New York)
2.47%
PJT Partners, Inc.
2.38%
IWO
Moog, Inc.
0.73%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.68%
MaxLinear, Inc.
0.66%
Argan, Inc.
0.66%
JFrog Ltd.
0.59%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.58%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
0.56%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
0.53%
D-Wave Quantum, Inc.
0.53%
StoneX Group, Inc.
0.52%
Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
0.51%
Cipher Digital, Inc.
0.50%
Plexus Corp.
0.49%
EnerSys
0.49%
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
0.48%
Frequently asked questions about ABLS and IWO
How have the ABLS and IWO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, ABLS is up 14.34% year-to-date (YTD), while IWO has returned 14.96%. That puts IWO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ABLS or IWO?
Year-to-date, the ABLS ETF saw -$682K in flows, compared to -$802M for IWO.
Which ETF is more volatile: ABLS or IWO?
Over the past year, ABLS had a volatility of 18.12%, while IWO experienced 22.54%.
Which ETF is bigger: ABLS or IWO?
As of July 30, 2026, ABLS holds $0.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWO manages $14.30 B.
What sectors do the ABLS and IWO ETFs invest in?
ABLS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWO focuses on Healthcare, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ABLS ETF and IWO ETF?
ABLS top holdings include Argan, Inc., Enova International, Inc. and Oscar Health, Inc.. IWO holds in its top three: Moog, Inc., BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. and MaxLinear, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: ABLS or IWO?
ABLS holds 46 securities with 63.47% of its assets in the top 15. IWO has 1122 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.51%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
