Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ABLSvsGRPZETF Comparison
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 GARP ETF (GRPZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Small Cap. ABLS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. In contrast, GRPZ's top sector exposures are Financials, Health Care and Industrials. ABLS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.35% for GRPZ. ABLS is down -9.48% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. GRPZ performs better with 0.96% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ABLS and GRPZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ABLS vs GRPZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ABLS GRPZ | -5.61%-6.81% | -12.64%-3.71% | -9.48%+0.96% | -5.41%+17.31% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | ABLS GRPZ | -- | --$1K | -- | +$225K-$5K | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ABLS GRPZ | +18.62%+16.58% | +21.80%+22.39% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | ABLS GRPZ | -12.64%-8.72% | -14.20%-14.71% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ABLS GRPZ | 88d32d | 249d46d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
ABLS | GRPZ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $26.81 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $26.80 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ABLS | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ABLS | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $26.81 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.01% |
| AuM | $0.91 M | $2.68 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.35% |
ABLS | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Abacus FCF Advisors | Invesco |
| Benchmark | Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Index |
| N° of holdings | 48 | 89 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 18, 2025 | March 27, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ABLS and GRPZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, ABLS is down -9.48% year-to-date (YTD), while GRPZ has returned 0.96%. That puts GRPZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ABLS or GRPZ?
Year-to-date, the ABLS ETF saw - in flows, compared to - for GRPZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: ABLS or GRPZ?
Over the past year, ABLS had a volatility of 21.8%, while GRPZ experienced 22.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: ABLS or GRPZ?
As of March 12, 2026, ABLS holds $0.91 M in assets under management (AUM), while GRPZ manages $2.68 M.
What sectors do the ABLS and GRPZ ETFs invest in?
ABLS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. Meanwhile, GRPZ focuses on Financials, Health Care and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the ABLS ETF and GRPZ ETF?
ABLS top holdings include ARGAN, COLLEGIUM PHAR/D and ARTISAN PARTNERS ASSET MANAGEMENT INC. GRPZ holds in its top three: INTERNATIONAL SEAWAYS, KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC and POWELL INDUSTRIES.
Which ETF is more diversified: ABLS or GRPZ?
ABLS holds 50 securities with 53.41% of its assets in the top 15. GRPZ has 90 securities and a top 15 weight of 25.48%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
