Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
AAUSvsIWLETF Comparison
Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell Top 200 ETF (IWL) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Both AAUS and IWL have the same Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.15%. AAUS is down -1.07% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. IWL performs worse with -1.6% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of AAUS and IWL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
AAUS vs IWL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AAUS IWL | -1.96%-2.09% | -1.58%-2.06% | -1.07%-1.60% | n/a+22.98% | n/a+90.96% | n/a+91.98% |
| Flows | AAUS IWL | +$284K-$17M | -$3M+$52M | -$2M+$27M | -+$124M | -+$473M | -+$432M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | AAUS IWL | +11.17%+12.13% | n/a+18.67% | n/a+15.25% | n/a+17.21% |
| Max drawdown | AAUS IWL | -3.31%-3.91% | n/a-13.89% | n/a-19.22% | n/a-25.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | AAUS IWL | 57d57d | n/a45d | n/a126d | n/a707d |
AAUS | IWL | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $54.26 | $167.70 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $54.43 | $167.80 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
AAUS | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
AAUS | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $54.26 | $167.70 |
| 1D performance | -0.31% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $481.52 M | $2.02 B |
| E/R | 0.15% | 0.15% |
AAUS | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Alpha Architect | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell Top 200 Index |
| N° of holdings | 258 | 191 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 23, 2025 | September 22, 2009 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the AAUS and IWL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, AAUS is down -1.07% year-to-date (YTD), while IWL has lost -1.6%. That puts AAUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: AAUS or IWL?
Year-to-date, the AAUS ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$27M for IWL.
Which ETF is bigger: AAUS or IWL?
As of March 10, 2026, AAUS holds $481.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWL manages $2.02 B.
What sectors do the AAUS and IWL ETFs invest in?
AAUS leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWL focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the AAUS ETF and IWL ETF?
AAUS top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: AAUS or IWL?
AAUS holds 266 securities with 48.93% of its assets in the top 15. IWL has 201 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.83%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
